Local News

Abaroa stole $15K in products from job, says former boss

Posted May 6, 2013
Updated May 7, 2013

— The former boss of Raven Abaroa, on trial for killing his wife eight years ago, testified Monday that Abaroa stole more than $15,000 in merchandise from the sporting goods company where he worked for more than a year.

Raymond Wilson Abaroa trial testimony (Day 5)

Abaroa, 33, is charged with first-degree murder in the April 26, 2005, death of Janet Abaroa, 25, who was fatally stabbed in the couple's Durham home.

Raymond Wilson, executive director of Hillsborough-based Sports Endeavors Inc., said the company began investigating Raven Abaroa after they were notified that four employee purchases for sports equipment that he made were never paid. Upon further scrutiny, they found nearly two dozen orders valued at about $15,000 that had never been paid.

"We felt strongly there was clear embezzlement going on, and we contacted police," Wilson said. "Raven knew we were onto him, and he was trying to cover his tracks."

More than four months after Janet Abaroa's death, Raven Abaroa pleaded guilty to embezzlement charges and was sentenced to two years' probation and ordered to pay back nearly $10,000.

Durham County prosecutors haven't offered a motive for Janet Abaroa's death but told jurors during opening statements last week that every piece of evidence would be a piece of a puzzle that, when put together, would prove that Raven Abaroa killed his wife.

On Friday, witnesses testified that the couple appeared to have financial problems and that Raven Abaroa talked about possibly selling his truck or motorcycle and that he also had to renegotiate the lease of their home on Ferrand Drive for cheaper monthly payments.

Raven Abaroa Raven Abaroa had money, anger problems

At the time of Janet Abaroa's death, he was working as an admissions specialist for a Raleigh company that specializes in online courses, making about $30,000 annually, his former supervisor, Sandy Garetone testified. She said that he was also in jeopardy of losing his job if he didn't reach his sales goals.

That was after he lost his job at Sports Endeavors, where Wilson testified that he helped hire Raven Abaroa as a team sales manager at an annual salary of approximately $40,000 but that there had been some discussion before hiring him that he was "too good to be true."

"Both of us, from the get-go, felt there was something he wasn't telling us or there was something different," Wilson said.

They made him an offer, he added, because he was enthusiastic and engaging and had a soccer background – all the qualifications that they were looking for to fill the position.

But Raven Abaroa's personality on the soccer field was quite different than at work, said Wilson, who played with him on the company's team and saw him get in arguments and sometimes physical altercations with others.

At one point, Wilson said, he had to sit down with Raven Abaroa to tell him that his behavior was a poor reflection of the company.

"He was definitely a bit of a hothead. It was very different than his work personality," he said. "You know, it's a co-ed parks and recreation league, not the World Cup."

But neither Wilson nor any of the number of Raven Abaroa's co-workers who testified Monday said they ever saw anything but a normal relationship between him and Janet Abaroa. They each admitted, however, that their interactions were limited to work and the occasional company event outside work.

Others in the couple's personal lives – neighbors, the babysitter for their 6-month-old son Kaiden, and church members – have also testified that they appeared to be a normal, young married couple.

Janet Abaroa's mother, however, said that her daughter told her that Raven Abaroa abused her verbally but not physically.

A neighbor who lived across the street from the Abaroas also testified that, on several occasions, she heard "very heated, very intense" arguments coming from their home.

Defense attorney Amos Tyndall admitted to jurors during opening statements that the Abaroas had difficulty making ends meet and that his client had stolen from his employer but that because of his past mistakes, investigators focused their attention only on him and ignored evidence, including an unknown fingerprint, an unknown DNA sample found in blood and a bloody shoe print.

Tyndall said Raven Abaroa was at a soccer game in Morrisville until 10 p.m. on the night of April 26, 2005, and then made the 35-minute drive home –stopping at a convenience store for a sports drink – to find Janet Abaroa in a pool of blood in an upstairs office.

A member of the Abaroas' church testified last week that he left the couple's home that night at 7 p.m. so that Raven Abaroa could get to his 9 p.m. game.

But Jason Strange testified Monday that Raven Abaroa arrived late.

"The game was probably going on for two to three minutes before he arrived on the bench," Strange said.

There was nothing unusual, however, about his behavior, Strange added, saying that Raven Abaroa played for most of the game and then left as soon as it was over – just like he always did.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • JessGH May 14, 2013

    Nothing was stolen from the home so that wasn't the motive, she was terrified of him, he abused his next wife, and he changes his behavior drastically based on who he's dealing with. Separately they don't mean murder, but added up they are very, very serious. Because they aren't separate issues. You can't cherry pick qualities about the man, and all added up it certainly is the most logical conclusion I can make.

  • observantone18 May 6, 2013

    Bartmeister, you have a good point. I'm not sure exactly what the all American boy who tragically lost his wife would look like, but I feel confident that he wouldn't be a convicted felon (embezzlement) that he would not have committed adultery and that he (this charming all American boy) probably wouldn't be on trial for murdering his pregnant wife. That's all I know now. That's all I know now, but you are right to ask what that is supposed to look like.. I don't know, but not seeing it with this defendant. Saw it a bit more with Jason Young. And we all know how that turned out.

  • Bartmeister May 6, 2013

    but the defendant doesn't seem to be coming across as the charming all American boy who tragically lost his wife.


    Curious what that is supposed to look like. Plus he doesn't have to be the wholesome "Opey Taylor" type to be or not be a murderer.

  • Bartmeister May 6, 2013

    Bartmeister: Who is saying there is a verdict? tigresspen


    umop apisdn posted "The rest of us didn't kill our spouses to get those things...you know, minor detail there". That was what I commented to. I understand the power of circumstantial evidence, it got Brad Cooper and Jason Young convicted. I do think it is harder to convict without DNA, since it has been touted as the end all be all for convictions and over turning convictions. I think concrete evidence will be more and more desired to convict in the future as science improves.

  • observantone18 May 6, 2013

    This has been a very eye-opening trial. Some of the postings here (dwntwnboy2 and dragnet1) make me wonder if they know the defendant personally and are trying to taint public opinion about the case. I am certainly not an attorney, but started watching the case when I heard about it on WRAL. I plan to keep an open mind, but the state seems to be pretty concise with it's evidence. If anything, I feel a little bad for the defense attorneys - they look uncomfortable and sometimes seem to be grabbing at straws. Of course, being a trial, things can change daily, but the defendant doesn't seem to be coming across as the charming all American boy who tragically lost his wife. Something about him seems off. But will have to keep watching to put the pieces together. But an interesting trial to say the least.

  • tigresspen May 6, 2013

    PS Bartmeister: Circumstantial evidence can be pretty powerful and show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Not every case has a video of murder or eye witness or DNA. Raven lived in that house too, his DNA should be there.

  • tigresspen May 6, 2013

    Bartmeister: Who is saying there is a verdict? All I said was what state has presented so far it looks like a DV murder. Doesn't mean future evidence won't show differently.

  • Bartmeister May 6, 2013

    The rest of us didn't kill our spouses to get those things...you know, minor detail there.
    umop apisdn


    AWESOME!!! What insight. A few days in and we have a verdict! Thanks, saves the State a lot of money.

  • Bartmeister May 6, 2013

    Quit screwing around and present the physical evidence. Dragnet1


    Well see......that's the problem. There is no physical evidence, on circumstantial.

  • Lindasue May 6, 2013

    If he was at a soccer game someone had to see him there.