Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

6:02 p.m. • 2-12-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Tue: Rain.
    • Hi: 53° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 57° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Is a Diamond-Purchase Refund Glittering in Your Future?


e-mail print friendly
Refunds Glitter for Some Diamond Buyers
Refunds Glitter for Some Diamond Buyers

Perhaps you or someone you know bought diamond jewelry in the last decade or so. If so, there might be a refund waiting.

It's part of a $295 million class-action suit against DeBeers, the company that produces most of the world's diamonds. It is not a popular subject in some quarters, however.

A 5 on Your Side investigation found that the suit is so touchy in the diamond industry that not one of the area jewelers contacted for this story would talk about it on camera. They said they were concerned about possible ramifications from DeBeers.

A series of lawsuits claimed the DeBeers group of companies conspired to fix the price of diamonds, monopolized the market and had misleading advertising.

Because of it, the suits claimed, consumers paid more for diamonds then they should have. A settlement says that consumers who bought diamond jewelry between 1994 and 2006 are eligible to share the $295 million.

One of the people who bought during the covered period is Crystal Burriss, who noticed an online posting.

“It said ‘diamond refunds,’ and that caught my attention,” Burriss said. “That's a lot of money, so I'd like to have my little chunk.

Burriss' original wedding set and a tennis bracelet both fit the time period.

“The ring was, assuming everything goes … as the percentages are outlined, $161. And it would be slightly more than that, I think around $200, for the bracelet,” Burriss said of her potential refunds.

Although refund amounts will vary depending on the number of total claims filed for a piece of the $295 million, the higher the cost of the diamond, the higher the payout percentage. For example, according to the settlement, a $1,000 piece of diamond jewelry could be eligible for a $320 refund.

Burriss said she plans to claim her portion and wants to get the word out so that other women can get theirs.

“I don't think I've met one person that it doesn't affect,” Burriss said.

Best of all, she said, there do not appear to be any strings attached – "the best kind of money."

Are You Eligible?

You are eligible for a claim if:

  • You purchased a diamond or diamond jewelry anytime between Jan. 1, 1994 to March 31, 2006.
  • You maintain a place of residencey in the United States.

To file a claim:

e-mail print friendly

8 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 8 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
What so wrong about having a monopoly on a non-essential product? Hmm? I understand a monopoly on, say, water or gasoline could be deadly. But diamonds?

Come to think of it, should OPEC be the next to be sued???

Surprised on a couple levels. First that people weren't aware of DeBeers creating a ridiculously overpriced market for vanity items that are very common minerals. They've been doing it since the company was founded decades ago. What also surprises me is that the courts had to be involved when people were voluntarily paying too much for said items.

It might have been a monopoly under the law, but considering the diamonds in question were vanity items (they did not list industrial diamonds) they could have simply been passed over for other types of adornment, such as moissanite, which is largely indisinguishable from diamond. But the law is the law, they knew they were caught and made it go away.

Who wins? Who loses?

My purchase was quiet large.I bet I get nothing.(1995)

The thing about it is that if they settled out of court, then by the very nature of a settlement it should be that they are guilty. They should change the law so that if someone settles they are required to admit guilt.

I made two purchases and I know I won't see a penny - much like the CD price fixing Class Action that I was part of.

I did not even get a check.

So, $295M divided by 10 years = $29.5M per year in refunds. I know that I personally received 6 diamond purchases during that time frame. Granted, they weren't extravagant, but I'm certain they totaled over $4K. I understand that the payout will only be a small portion of the original price, but I can't imagine that the pay out is going to be very much if every person in America goes in for a refund.

View Comments VIEW ALL 8 COMMENTS

Experian Credit Center

Average Credit Score: 678. See Yours Free!
1. Make sure possible inaccuracies aren't hurting your credit
2. Detect potential identity theft
3. Stay on top of your credit without hurting your score

See your Free Credit Report online in seconds when you sign up for a free 30-day credit monitoring trial!

advertisement