Health Team

3-D ultrasounds give expectant parents crisp images of unborn baby

Posted February 15, 2013

— More and more expectant parents are getting a jump on their baby photo albums by paying for crisp 3-D ultrasound images of their unborn child. 

For Mike and Jennifer Paramore, the fuzzy, two-dimensional ultrasound image of their son's face just wasn't enough. So, they opted to pay $135 extra for a 3-D ultrasound from provider Kamm McKenzie OBGYN in Raleigh.

The 3-D option has available for several years, but the pictures and processing speeds are improving.

"I knew it was available before. I'd seen a lot of images from my friends," Jennifer Paramore said.

"This is just a series of two-dimensional images that the computer puts together for a three-dimensional picture," said Dr. Joel Bernstein from Kamm McKenzie.

The 2-D sonogram is still the standard in prenatal care, and 3-D imaging technology provides no diagnostic advantages over it, but that could eventually change, Bernstein said.

3D ultrasound makes unborn baby 'more real' for expectant couple Couple says 3-D ultrasound makes unborn baby 'more real'

"The technology seems to be moving to using it more diagnostically, for example with heart defects," he said.

Some non-medical ultrasound centers offer the experience, but Bernstein said he prefers patients to have it done in a doctor's office. 

"We have the health providers here that can provide support and appropriate follow-up if we did find anything abnormal on one of these ultrasounds," he said.

For the Paramores, the pictures are worth the extra money.

"I think it makes it more real," Mike Paramore said.

He even sees a family resemblance.

"Unfortunately, the nose," he joked. "(The baby) probably has my nose."

7 Comments

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Oldest First
View all
  • jimcool59 Feb 22, 6:37 p.m.

    Do they even know they can get an even crisper image for free? When its born.

  • timexliving Feb 19, 6:05 p.m.

    These images bring home the fact that there really is a child in the womb and not a mass of tissue as some would have us believe.

  • sww Feb 19, 10:31 a.m.

    When I was pregnant, the doctors advised against ultrasounds unless there was a concern about the baby. They didn't do them just because they could.

  • Watermelon Feb 18, 2:48 p.m.

    Whatever happened to the fun of the surprise?

  • sykesmelissa99 Feb 18, 1:38 p.m.

    My doctors office has these machines, and did this with my ultrasound. They do this for all of their patients, and they did not charge my additional money.

  • Sweetgrl3 Feb 18, 1:37 p.m.

    The best Dr's in town. Love them.

  • Snakebite Survivor Feb 18, 9:39 a.m.

    Dr. Bernstein "prefers patients to have it done in a doctor's office." Couldn't be that extra $135, could it?