Local News

'Sadistic desires' led to 4-year-old's murder, state says

Posted March 24
Updated March 25

— Jonathan Douglas Richardson satisfied over and over his "sadistic desires" on 4-year-old Teghan Skiba for the 10 days in 2010 that he kept her confined to a small shed that doubled as his torture chamber, prosecutors told jurors Monday during closing arguments in the 25-year-old's first-degree murder trial.

"That's the ugly truth," Johnston County Assistant District Attorney Paul Jackson said in a heated and emotional presentation. "Before she died, she went through the most heinous, cruel suffering that anyone could imagine. You still can't wrap your mind around it."

The jury of seven women and five men spent four weeks listening to testimony that, at times, brought some of them to tears, upset court employees and caused trained, professional witnesses, including a sheriff's deputy for 18 years, to break down on the stand.

The result, Jackson said: "None of us are the same."

"Ten days of continuous torment, torture and terror, and you don't want to think about it, but you have to," Jackson said. "There will come a time when you can – or at least try – but now is not the time, because we still have a responsibility, and we still have a duty."

After daylong closings, Superior Court Judge Thomas Lock sent jurors home. They will return to court Tuesday to begin their deliberations on the murder charge as well as felony child abuse, kidnapping and sexual abuse charges.

Potentially facing the death penalty, Richardson is accused of abusing Teghan in the 15-by-13-foot shed behind the Smithfield home of his grandparents while her mother – his girlfriend at the time – Helen Reyes, was out of the state for Army Reserve training.

He took the girl to a local hospital on July 16, 2010, with more than 60 bite marks covering her body, as well as bruises, abrasions and marks – the results of "atrocious cruel acts that came from a dark place," according to Jackson – that doctors testified were too many to count.

The child died three days later from blunt force trauma to the head – a fatal injury that defense attorneys argued was unintentional.

"Everything about this case is so incredibly tragic," said defense attorney Jonathan Broun.

But he urged jurors to put aside their "natural and understandable instincts about what happened" and to apply the law to the facts in the case.

When they do, he added, they will see that the child's death was the result of a combination of Richardson's inexperience with children, his own experiences of being abused as a child, undiagnosed mental disorders and his inability to control his anger.

"You all have been given a duty and responsibility to decide this case, to determine exactly what happened," Broun said. "There are hard questions that have to be answered, facts that have to be analyzed and law that has to be applied to this case."

Richardson loved Teghan and never intended to kill her, his defense attorneys argued, and he never sexually abused her.

The head injury, they said, was the result of a frustrated Richardson shaking the girl with "incredible force" that caused her to hit her head on a door.

The evidence, they added, does not meet the requirements for a first-degree murder conviction.

"As bad as it was – and I'm not telling you that it wasn't, it was awful – what actually ended her life was a blow to the head," defense attorney Mike Klinkosum said. "One quick action, one quick force that ended her life."

But Jackson quipped at the contention, saying nothing minimized Richardson's culpability for the crimes.

"It's easy to forget what this is about when you listen to them talk about what really is no defense," he said.

"The only way you can find this defendant not guilty is through fantastic leaps of the imagination," he added. "The only way you can find him not guilty is if you check your common sense at the door."

47 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • jennycap Mar 27, 10:27 a.m.

    This is the mother's fault - he had hurt the child before and she chose to leave Teaghan with him. Jonathon had tried to break up with the mom (Helen) before - she didn't want to lose him so she used the baby as a tie - if she left Teaghan with him it was a connection to her while she was away.

  • beach2011 Mar 26, 2:27 p.m.

    Where were the grandparents??? They think is OK for their granddaughter to live in a SHED! I doubt it was the first time he had done these things - so why would the mother and her family leave the child with him??? Are any of them facing any charges?

  • truthhurts1000 Mar 25, 3:15 p.m.

    That poor baby. I really don't understand a government that will continue to let these things go uncorrected by not screening our children in the school systems

  • skimchai Mar 25, 11:08 a.m.

    Did the grandmother testify that she never saw the child in the 10 days she was in the shed? If... View More

    — Posted by mary2214

    "Gram" said she went to the shed one day to see if JR and Teghan wanted to come in for lunch,... View More

    — Posted by misschris234

    My blood boils reading this. I can't believe "Gram" wasn't charged with something. She is NOT an innocent bystander. She knew something was off and she did nothing. I hope she is haunted by her negligence every day of the rest of her life.

  • Lightfoot3 Mar 25, 11:01 a.m.

    "JR screamed for Teghan to get away from the door (in a not very nice way). She also saw feces in front of the shed, and she heard Teghan whimpering. And did NOTHING." - misschris234


    We're seeing these things with hindsight colored glasses. At the time, it wouldn't necessarily signal the girl was being abused. I've seen/heard plenty of kids whimpering, parents screaming at them in not nice ways, etc. Kids went on to be adults and apparently weren't abused. This sack of droppings didn't treat his grandparents with respect, so she's not going to push him too far, plus she testified she didn't know the mom was away on training.


    The one truly responsible for the abuse (the dude) is on trial. The one that knew he was abusive, yet put the child in danger (the mom) will be on trial later. But so far I haven't seen any evidence that the dude's grandparents knew of the abuse or suspected the abuse.

  • EricaSliver Mar 25, 10:22 a.m.

    Please let this "man" get what he deserves...Teghan deserves justice.

  • misschris234 Mar 25, 10:07 a.m.

    The instructions WILL be streamed. Sick juror just arrived.

  • misschris234 Mar 25, 9:53 a.m.

    Did the grandmother testify that she never saw the child in the 10 days she was in the shed? If... View More

    — Posted by mary2214

    "Gram" said she went to the shed one day to see if JR and Teghan wanted to come in for lunch, but JR screamed for Teghan to get away from the door (in a not very nice way). She also saw feces in front of the shed, and she heard Teghan whimpering. And did NOTHING.

  • misschris234 Mar 25, 9:50 a.m.

    Still waiting on a live stream link. Normally posted on their home page. HELP, I want to hear... View More

    — Posted by NCchick

    Court is late today because of a sick juror. She is apparently on her way in. There may not be a live stream for the instructions since the only part streamed has been the arguments. I'm hoping they will!!!

  • FakeCoastalRings Mar 25, 9:46 a.m.

    I am so sick and tired of evertime some evil monster commits a dispicable crimes such as this,... View More

    — Posted by Sweet Angel

    Good points and good advice.

More...