'Moral Mondays' forcing changes in Wake arrest procedures

Posted June 25, 2013

— The high volume of arrests at Moral Monday protests at the North Carolina State Legislative Building has changed how protesters violating misdemeanor trespassing laws are being handled once they are arrested – changes that are raising the brow of at least one conservative think-tank.

Since April 29, more than 600 people, including 120 this week, have been arrested while speaking out against Republican-backed policies and legislation that they believe disproportionately hurt the poor and minorities.

Generally, after a person is arrested in Wake County, he or she is taken to the City-County Bureau of Identification – a county law enforcement agency that, among its many responsibilities, books, fingerprints and photographs alleged offenders before they go before a magistrate.

Sam Pennica, director of CCBI, says that, beginning with last week's arrests, protesters bypass being fingerprinted and photographed to help cut costs incurred by the influx of people being taken into custody.

As the number of protesters grows, he says, so does the number of staff needed to process them, as well as arrestees from the county's other law enforcement agencies, including the sheriff's office and police departments for all Wake County municipalities.

'Moral Monday' arrests 'Moral Monday' arrests continue strain on Wake justice system

CCBI agents also collect and analyze evidence at crime scenes, and with limited funding for overtime, Pennica says he has to weigh how to best use that funding.

"It's a matter of dollars and cents and how much money I have to operate CCBI and whether I spend that money on fingerprinting and photographing someone who's arrested for trespassing, or do I pay an investigator overtime to work a homicide?" he said. "Those are the decisions we have to make."

But Francis DeLuca, president of Civitas Institute, says he questions the financial reason that Pennica says is behind the change in booking the protesters.

Civitas, which describes itself as "North Carolina's conservative voice," is known for its polling and policy reports relevant to topics before the General Assembly. It has been posting details of Moral Mondays arrests, including mug shots, employer information and salaries, to its website.

"We've requested that actual information, and as of right now, I'm not so sure it's a real resource question," DeLuca said. "In terms of what we've seen from our actual requests, it's not a huge burden."

He says he is also concerned that protesters are now being handled differently when they're arrested.

"Now, they're being processed through the clerk of court, which is basically filling out a form and then being released. They get a court date and aren't getting fingerprinted or mug shots," DeLuca said. "I kind of equate it to fishing. It's like catch and release. You catch a fish and throw it back into the water."

But he says he hesitates to say if politics are playing a part in the recent change. "There's a bunch of different agencies, so you don't know exactly where to put the finger and say, 'This is the person making this decision.'"

Wake County District Attorney Colon Willoughby says the move has nothing to do with politics but rather how to efficiently run CCBI and get cases through the justice system.

"We have limited court resources that we're trying to properly allocate and be good stewards, and (the Moral Monday arrests) are putting a severe burden on (the resources), and I'm trying to figure out how to deal with it."

If every person charged so far in the Moral Monday protests were to want a trial, Willoughby says he estimates it would take an entire year for a District judge to hear and rule on the cases.

"It's a tremendous amount of resources when we're struggling to try to get drunken-driving cases and domestic violence cases and violent juveniles processed through the District Court," he said. "It's a tremendous imposition on them, and it's being felt only by Wake County. The other 99 counties don't bear this burden."

He says he hasn't ruled out having to ask the General Assembly to appropriate more funding to handle the cases.

"If they think it's important, then they certainly ought to be willing to back that feeling up with the resources for us to prosecute these cases," Willoughby said. "If they don't think it's important, then that's certainly a signal to me of how I ought to view these cases."

As for the changes in processing arrestees, Willoughby says that state law allows law enforcement agencies to use discretion as to whether to fingerprint and photograph people charged with misdemeanor crimes.

Every person arrested, however, must still go before a magistrate and still has a criminal background check to see if they are wanted on other offenses.

Willoughby says he initially proposed citing the Moral Monday protesters instead of arresting them but that General Assembly Police Chief Jeff Weaver rejected the idea.

Weaver says citations would not be effective.

"The problem is, if they won't leave when we ask them to, then us trying to issue them a citation on the spot is not much of an alternative," Weaver said.

"We've tried to figure out all the alternatives," he added. "Other than the fact of what we're doing now, we don't see any."


This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • saturn5 Jul 1, 2013

    oldenosprey: "Your knowledge of the employment status of thousands of people of all ages is impressive indeed. Please tell us how you came to have this information."

    The news article is about people being arrested. Do the math.

  • seaduckin Jun 27, 2013

    while I think these violators should be processed like any other criminals, the burden is too costly and a waste of money and valuable resources. lets just convict them and fine them at least $1000 per arrest to cover the extra costs of this nuisance.

  • goldenosprey Jun 27, 2013

    "The protestors either dont work or dont want to work. Being arrested is not going to look good on their employment application." superman

    Your knowledge of the employment status of thousands of people of all ages is impressive indeed. Please tell us how you came to have this information.

  • pointgiven2 Jun 27, 2013

    People comment over and over (many times the same ones) about the protestors not working. What are these commenters doing? Obviously, not working!

  • superman Jun 27, 2013

    The protestors either dont work or dont want to work. Being arrested is not going to look good on their employment application.

  • delta29alpha Jun 27, 2013

    or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]--Cary Progressive-------------------------------------------------

    Exactly right, however when you purposely disrupt and impede the lawful activities of other citizens, then you are no longer peaceful and therefore not protected under this amendment.

    The protesters who get arrested have knowingly and purposely violated the law and should be subject to trial, conviction and be given the maximum penalty allowed under the law. This should include not only the fine but also whatever jail time or community service that is prescribed by statute. This should be done no matter how long it takes to bring them to trial.

  • djofraleigh Jun 26, 2013

    The average citizen will only have any real power when we END the withholding tax, so tax day each month, we can decide if we want to financially support our government's actions or protest via civil disobedience.

    The thought of the general public holding their own, whole paychecks in their own hands and then deciding to either pay their tax or not on it horrifies those in power.

    Imagine half-the workers in NC not paying taxes in for just one month! Government workers (non-essential) would not get paid. Universities would close. Politicians would listen to those protesting via the purse strings. This taking of the wage tax from worker started during WWII. It's time to end it.

    Of course, this would cause problems to us all, especially at first, but it could come only from those objecting to the way government "of the people, by the people and for the people" is being carried out by politicians. If enough people object, then why wait years for elections? Like now!

  • djofraleigh Jun 26, 2013

    Democrats are not going to let go of a 100 years power without a protest!

    WRAL used "FORCING" in the headline is strange. What force was used to get the PC treatment? The people pictured being handcuffs are all smiling, happy and not resisting. The Wake District Attorney and Clerk of Court are being forced to treat some different than most. If they are already planning on dismissals, then go on and do it now! Well, that would blunt the media effect.

  • djofraleigh Jun 26, 2013

    Is prosecutor Willowby a Democrat? Is the Clerk of Court? If so, maybe this is part of the show, but if not, then not.

    So, a hundred more arrests a week is too much for the court to handle! Will all protest groups, including abortion protesters, be treated this way, without mugshot or fingerprints, fill out a form at the clerk's office and leave-- the "catch & release?"

    This is like advertising for more protests. I'm thinking I might go down there and hold up banners about abortion ending more black life in the USA since 1973 than all violent crime, AIDS, cancer, heart disease put together -- a genocidal number! I wonder if the media would cover it the same?

  • jreb919 Jun 26, 2013

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]Cary Progressive

    it hasn't.